- AI-supported Engineering
- 1. Metrics project
- 2. Stakeholder communication
- 3. MicroHRV: Recognizing Rare Events in Microwave Radio Links and Intensive Care Units using Machine Learning
- 4. T4AI – Transforming Software Architectures for AI
- 5. DEVELOP – Design, Verification and Validation of ML systems in automotive
- Cybersecurity Hackathon and Design Jam @ Software Center Reporting workshop
- Industrial impact of Rendex – requirements quality tool
- QuaSAR@car
- RAWFP – Resource aware functional programming
- Size and quality between software development approaches
- VISEE
- Workshop on Software Metrics and Measurements as Foundations of Big Data, Software Analytics and Machine Learning
- Continuous and Automated Quality Assurance
- An Analysis of Team-based Development within an Activity Based Working Environment
- Aspects of Automated Testing
- Call for participation in an investigation in Continuous Integration Visualization
- Modeling and Analyzing Collaborating Machines
- Modeling and Analyzing Event-based Autonomous Systems
- Data Visualization for Continuous Integration
- Enterprise Scale Continuous Integration and Delivery
- Continuous Delivery
- Continuous Safety, Security and Architecture
- IoTArch: Improving the Design and Realization of Situational Aware Internet of Things Systems for Emergency Situations Handling
- Managing Model Inconsistencies
- Model-based development and continuous integration
- Closing the Safety-Security gap in software intensive systems
- Evolution support for architectural artefacts
- Managing Architectural Technical Debt
- Managing Interoperability Concerns in Large Systems
- End-to-end Variability Management
- Ensuring Quality of Service through Modeling of Resource Requirements and Service-level Agreements in Industrial IoT
- Managing Interoperability Concerns in Large Systems
- Managing Practices for Development Speed
- Scaling Agile development in mechatronics organizations
- Customer Data- and Ecosystem-Driven Development
- Data-driven Digital Transformation
- Metrics
Vision
All Software Center companies have efficient product development, release and deployment processes.
Mission
We help the companies to design and develop modern measurement methods and tools by utilizing state-of-the-art analytics, AI and machine learning.
We use Action Research to increase the impact and adoption of the results (Action Research in Software Engineering), i.e., we work on-site of the companies.
Over the course of ten years of our collaboration, our theme has resulted in over 50 models and tools. We have also published over 200 papers and books that disseminate the results to the public domain.
Examples of the metrics designed and introduced to the companies:
- Release readiness: measuring the number of weeks that the product development team needs to release the product (Agile): Release Readiness Indicator for Mature Agile and Lean Software Development Projects | SpringerLink
- Change waves: measuring the impact of a change on software product: Identifying Implicit Architectural Dependencies Using Measures of Source Code Change Waves | IEEE Conference Publication | IEEE Xplore
- Defect inflow: predicting the number of defects that the development team needs to handle in the coming weeks: Predicting weekly defect inflow in large software projects based on project planning and test status - ScienceDirect
- Code quality: measuring and improving the impact of coding practices on software quality: Recognizing lines of code violating company-specific coding guidelines using machine learning | SpringerLink
- Engineering level: measuring the quality of code in a git repository: PHANTOM: Curating GitHub for engineered software projects using time-series clustering (springer.com)
- SimSAX project similarity: measuring the similarity of projects, for example to monitor the process evolution: LegacyPro—A DNA-Inspired Method for Identifying Process Legacies in Software Development Organizations | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore, and Simsax: A measure of project similarity based on symbolic approximation method and software defect inflow - ScienceDirect
- MeTEAM: measuring the maturity of software metric teams: MeTeaM—A method for characterizing mature software metrics teams - ScienceDirect
- MESRAM: measuring the quality and quantity of measurement programs: MeSRAM – A method for assessing robustness of measurement programs in large software development organizations and its industrial evaluation - ScienceDirect
Projects
- Continuous Product and Organizational Performance
- Stakeholder Communication
- Associated: MicroHRV
- Associated: T4AI
- Associated: Develop
- Finished: Quasar@Car - Quantifying meta-model changes
- Finished: VISEE - Verification and Validation of ISO 26262 requirements at the complete EE system level
- Finished: Longitudinal Measurement of Agility and Group Development
- Finished: Size and Quality between Software Development Approaches
- Finished: RAWFP - Resource Aware Functional Programming
Metrics blog
- Can we force LLMs to generate the code we really want? June 18, 2026Experiment design – from the paper Large Language Models (LLMs) are revolutionary for programming productivity, producing functional code snippets in seconds. However, as software engineers, my co-authors and I know that “functional” is not the same as “well-designed.” LLMs are generally “bottom-up” thinkers; they excel at local syntax but struggle to adhere to higher-level architectural […]Miroslaw Staron
- My prompt is better than your prompt – how to optimize your prompts in the age of agentic AI June 12, 2026Image generated by Gemini based on the content of this post https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.19102 Getting Large Language Models (LLMs) to write functional code often feels like casting spells; a slight misphrasing in your prompt can result in a buggy output. This is even more important now that we have agents which work for days on our tasks. […]Miroslaw Staron
- 15 years of Software Center – A Look in the Mirror and over the Front Windshield June 10, 2026Image source: Gemini, based on the summary of this blog post. When I write this post, I’m sitting at a reporting workshop of Software Center, at Axis Communications in Lund. Jan has reminded us that we’ve been going on for 15 years. That’s most of my academic career and a lot of my life. Although […]Miroslaw Staron
- Junior Architects with Shaky Logic: Testing AI’s Real-World Coding Skills – article review June 5, 2026Image generated by Gemini based on the blog post content https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.23340 We have all seen Large Language Models (LLMs) write impressive snippets of code or debug a tricky function. AI coding editors like GitHub Copilot are increasingly adopted, with studies suggesting that up to 88% of developers report increased productivity. But accelerations in development come […]Miroslaw Staron
- The Synthetic Engineer: Measuring the Real Impact of AI on Software Delivery May 18, 2026https://miroslawstaron.github.io/hallucinations.html#/5 The shift from manual coding to AI-augmented orchestration is no longer a future – it is a reality. Software engineers adopt AI increasingly often and increasingly deep. However, as organizations pour investment into Generative AI tools, a critical question remains: How do we measure the true return on investment? I asked Gemini to analyze […]Miroslaw Staron
Theme 3, Leader: Miroslaw Staron

Professor, Software Engineering division, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Gothenburg
More information
Miroslaw.Staron@cse.gu.se
Phone: +46 31 772 10 81